• Photo
  • Design
    • Graphic Design Overview
    • Branding
    • Illustration
    • Typography
    • Web Design
    • Interaction
  • Side Projects
    • writing
    • drawing
    • video
    • leathercraft
  • about
  • contact
  • blog
RBAphoto
  • Photo
  • Design
    • Graphic Design Overview
    • Branding
    • Illustration
    • Typography
    • Web Design
    • Interaction
  • Side Projects
    • writing
    • drawing
    • video
    • leathercraft
  • about
  • contact
  • blog

Those Damn Millennials

DSC00217.jpg

Is my generation ruining the world or saving it?

Did the Baby Boomers screw us up?

Are Gen-Xers playing us off each other?

Am I even a millennial?

 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (shrug emoji)

Before I say anything, I need to acknowledge that my inspiration here was the recent Cracked Podcast episode about Millennials, released May 8th 2017. I cannot pretend to have assembled all these thoughts on my own.

I was born within the first 30 days of what is commonly considered the beginning of "The Millennial Generation", January 1982. This consensus is based on the podcast I just listened to, but digging deeper into the subject, it is easy to see that the time-frame is highly flexible. Now, the cynic inside me is desperate to rant about how this movable date line means sometimes articles consider me a millennial and sometimes they don't. It always seems like people my age are called millennials when the article is criticizing, but I get cut out when they are praising. That is just perception bias I assume.

Although that is not entirely true. The Cracked Podcast accurately identifies this rising trend in lazy article writing which unfairly targets millennials. Clearly the older generation has been complaining about the 'youth of today' ever since language began. This is nothing new - there have always been newspapers and other media outlets which fill the dead air with uncreative bullshit about how the kids are immoral. What makes this current trend slightly more frustrating is the use of the term 'millennial' as an agreed upon factual basis. The window of time defining millennials stretches to fit the narrative, which is shaky at best.

In the past, my reaction was to try and resurrect the old term "gen-Y", and apply it to anyone born between 1975 and 1990. In my experience, this window of time yielded a much more socially similar group than the 1982-2000 range.  Generation-Y was the term we used in the 90s. It is a lazy extension of Gen-X, linguistically speaking, but my generation shares many traits with those who immediately preceded us. Trends ascribed to millennials are often inacurate and sometimes completely incorrect. Lazy writers blur the lines to the point that even 14 year olds in the year 2017 are considered millennials, reducing the word to a blanket term meaning "anyone younger than me".

More often than not, the "me" who wrote the misinformed, lazy article about millennials is a generation-Xer whose overarching theory can be simplified in a single sentence : Millennials are lazy and entitled and their coddling Baby Boomer parents made them that way. It's a convenient narrative that starts fun little rage-induced arguments that cause an article to be shared a million times on social media, which is the point from the outset. There are certainly articles out there which also extol the virtues of boomers, millennials, and gen-x, but those do not gain equal traction. I understand that, as with many subjects on the internet, the reader can easily be distracted by the vocal minority and forget that most people are peaceful and do not blame the problems of the world on any one age-group. This is, ultimately, a very soft pseudo-science subject.

All that being said, here small is a list of traits commonly assigned to millennials which not only do not apply to me, but my experience was the polar opposite.

  1. Cars. The rise of new forms of communication, and more recently ride-sharing apps, combined with rising fuel costs and increased attention on the concept of a "carbon footprint" has led to a steep decline in the need to get a driver's license as soon as possible. For the majority of the 20th century, gaining access to a vehicle has been a right of passage for American teens*. One major aspect of the inacurate narrative about my generation is that we are killing the auto industry OR we are combating global warming depending on your political allegiance. The truth is that the auto industry is changing, and habits are mutating for all age groups. The rise of social media and online gaming did not truly take hold until around 2006-07 when high speed internet had reached its tipping point, and the iphone was released. These indoor activities supplanted the need to drive everywhere all the time, and led 16 year olds to de-emphasize the need for a license. Personally, I was in my mid-20s when this tip occurred. Social media was a decade away when I attended high-school, and even though dial-up internet was around, it was widely derided, ignored, and deemed unnecessary by the majority of society.

  2. Communication. To expand on what I began above, Millennials are often tied to the rise of social media. There is a revisionist approach to our historic relationship with the internet. Time has proven the utility of the internet and now everyone pretends they were on board all along. News media, politicians, educators, and anyone who worked in the upper tier of an office - all of these people were highly resistant to change, and constantly diminished the potential of the internet throughout the 90s. It was a thing to be mocked as a hobbyist fascination that might amount to something in another 50 years or so. The news media has been especially guilty of hypocrisy when you look at how often today they will simply read thoughts and opinions directly from the various message boards.

*I fully acknowledge that the experiences of many Americans, possibly the majority, did not permit for luxuries like a car, let alone many cars, which would permit teens to drive at age 16. Despite this fact, what is important to my argument is the overall perception of the American experience as dictated by popular culture and media which is always idealized and not entirely representational.

categories: Sociology
Friday 09.15.17
Posted by Robert Bruce Anderson
 

Political Rant Season

Its political rant season, y'all! How are you celebrating?

I think one of the most frustrating parts of this past week has been the realization that all of our political satire may be a big part of the problem, and that we are every bit as responsible as Fox News, but I am getting ahead of myself...

It has taken every fiber of my being to avoid jumping head-first into a rage-filled rant over the past week.

Here are some podcasts that have calmed me down, and some of my favorite key points to remember.

Common Sense 311 - http://www.dancarlin.com/common-sense-home-landing-page/

The democrats ran an establishment candidate in a counter-establishment election. I personally like Hillary. She is obviously not the ideal candidate, and not the ideal female candidate, but in 2016, she is the only female candidate who can make it to the ballot. 

Trump is the first non-politician to take the white house since Eisenhower. Trump is not nearly as Republican as he has been claiming to be. He was the least-Republican option out of the entire primary lineup. He is a third-party candidate in Republican clothes. His election is clear evidence of the need and desire for the dismantling of the two party system. 

The Republicans and the Democrats both lost this election. Perhaps we will now have a robust third party which follows the Trumpian system. Obviously, I would have preferred that the Libertarian or Green party were the ones to rise to real prominence, but the results on Tuesday clearly show that the two parties are not satisfying a huge portion of the US. 

Trump actually managed to flip a LOT of Obama voters. We are led to believe that most Americans are die-hard fans of their own party because they are the ones that make the news. In actuality voters are very open to voting for the other side. There is clearly room for a third party or some serious re-imagining of the two party system.

Cracked - https://soundcloud.com/crackedpod/what-the-fk-just-happened-election-autopsy

All politics in the US is a pendulum. Both sides effectively take turns steering the ship. The country leans a bit too far left, and then starts turning right for a while. The net direction is forward. One side steers too far, and the other side seizes control. This is how we prevent civil war.

The voters Trump electrified feel their way of life slipping away. Now, as a straight white male liberal, it is easy for me to say "grow up, because your beliefs are backwards and wrong." This helps no one. It frustrates me and angers those who disagree. I wish I could tell every poor uneducated white Trump voter that nobody is going to force you to get gay married or take your goddamn handguns, but that is only part of it. The real fear is that the bigot redneck way of life will disappear because parents can no longer force their children to agree with them. There is just too much information available.

It certainly feels like the US just became Republican Conservatives overnight. That is not true. We are the same country today that we were last week. 26% of us voted for Trump. 26% voted for Clinton. 2% voted for 3rd parties. 47% stayed home. Polling-wise, as a country, we are still more progressive than we have ever been. Gay marriage had no support 30 years ago - 55% are in favor of it today. Legal abortion is favored by 56%. Universal healthcare is favored by 58%. Global warming is a concern for 64% of us. 3 of the Trump states voted to legalize marijuana. 

The Trump presidency will force us to have a rational debate about issues that seem self-evident. There was a time that politicians had to have actual debates over the pros and cons of institutionalized segregation. It certainly felt like we had all digested that information and moved forward, but clearly we need to brush up on some of the basics. The problem is that it is too easy to scream 'fascist' when we hear thoughts we deem unthinkable. Debates about the value of multiculturalism feel beneath us, but that mentality allows us to ignore the debates entirely. Just saying that xenophobes are backwards monsters means we skipped the part where we actually discuss why. 

Slate Political Gabfest - http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/gabfest/2016/11/trump_s_victory_how_trump_will_govern_and_what_his_opponents_should_do_now.html

categories: Sociology
Tuesday 11.15.16
Posted by Robert Bruce Anderson
 

The perfect jeans

a quarter century of fashion-based anxiety

I am a 34 year old white American male who has spent at least twenty five years fretting over style choices. I want to be unique but I do not want to draw too much attention. I want to fit in, but I refuse to wear many of the style conventions of the day. I want to appear timeless, but also to reflect a specific time in history. Above all, I want to have clothes that actually fit and do not fall apart. Satisfying these requirements has been a constant struggle of my adult life. In an effort to chronicle my journey through this admittedly shallow and unimportant issue, I will focus on the one constant of my attire - the blue jeans.

The year was 1991. I was a nine year old child in Birmingham Alabama attending a typical private mostly white middle school. Styles were changing drastically from the late 80s. Blue jeans always had their place in the cultural style of the time, but the notion of a fashion designer jean hadn't been invented. You had Levi's and a few other brands which mostly espoused the cowboy western vibe. There were certainly avant garde artists and musicians who wore jeans, but it was seen as a low class working man's attire. Levi's made one style of jean, and it was called "levi's". They were stiff as all hell and took years to break in, but they were essentially indestructible. Today they call them "501 style".

Things began to change (from my perspective) when Levi's started running these "Big Jeans" commercials. They had embraced this laid back surfer/skater style and started making jeans that were deliberately not for cowboys. I was nine years old, and the commercial essentially won me over. I would argue that I viewed it from an intelligent strategic perspective though. To navigate middle school, one must dress appropriately so as not to be singled out and mocked. I desperately wanted to wear the right clothing in order to avoid any attention. I knew not to try and keep up with the raw cutting edge fashion, but rather to ride the wave of being current, but not too current.

The answer was Levi's "big" jeans, graphic t-shirt, and an unbuttoned plaid flannel. It was essentially exactly what you might find Eddie Vedder wearing. I wore this exact combination every day until I was 14. I was mirroring the grunge style that was slowly taking over the legitimate fashion world, but really I was just copying the older kids and the commercials I saw. By the time I was in 8th grade at age 13, I had some more confidence, and started to wear more jet black levis. This was 1994. The fashion world had changed their stance on blue jeans, and now all sorts of clothing companies began making their own jeans. The change was rapid. It was like the SUV craze of the later 90s. Nobody made jeans, then everybody did.

This was the time that hip-hop culture invented saggy jeans. Like the zoot suit of the 20s, the saggy jeans deliberately use more fabric than necessary to proclaim opulence. Jeans now exuded hipness, and came in a rainbow of flavors from many different designers. "Loose fit" was the buzz word they all shared. Your choices might be "classic, loose, or baggy".

I remember corduroy came into fashion and everyone was wearing slacks with fairly muted earth-tones. The overall trend was to wear baggy clothes, which often translated into just buying the "large" size of everything. It was slightly absurd, but I suppose it was a boon for the parents at the time who had children going through their growth spurts. I remember having a pair of black corduroy pants cut in the style of blue jeans which had a 35 inch waist. This was easily 5 inches too big for me, and I had to wear a belt that doubled over the waistband to make them appear to fit properly. One look that I loved was to wear a denim button down shirt tucked in over a white t shirt and black jeans. I am not sure where I picked that up, but it was a look that was everywhere it seems. I remember planning out my week to make sure I wore that outfit on friday. I shudder to think what I looked like then.

In 1997, for grade 9, I changed to a different school, and drastically toned down my wardrobe. I had some super generic levi's jeans, this time just the classic cowboy style. I would wear a baggy graphic t-shirt over this. This began my quest for the perfect graphic t-shirt, but that is another story entirely. The short version is that I witnessed graphic t-shirts go from sincere to ironic to manufactured ironic to what we have today, which I might call "crowd sourced ironic" t-shirts. Suffice to say, my goal was to have a t-shirt that not only fit well, but also endorsed something that was either funny or genuine. It couldn't be too funny, or endorse something genuine which was embarrassing. Self-deprecation was fine, but it requires confidence and popularity, which I did not have starting at a new school.

My outfit also included some generic GAP brand khaki slacks, which were accepted post-grunge attire. My school was actually fairly avant garde and stylish, so we tended to shun certain trends. One trend that we were not able to avoid was Abercrombie and Fitch. This brand went from being completely unknown to being the uber-hip store for teens in front of my eyes. I personally shopped there more than I'd like to admit. The aesthetic was fully embracing the post-grunge look - casual button down shirts, baggy jeans, surfer necklaces, etc. It was great to have a store that sold all the grunge attire I wanted, but was new and from a brand that had been accepted as cool.

Abercrombie worked alright for me to a point. Their clothes were always designed for some kind of gorilla-man. To fit properly, you are expected to be a card-carrying oaf. I have never been truly "slim", or "small", especially in my shoulder breadth. In order to fit my shoulders, the clothes were always too long. I stuck with them because the brand was guaranteed to make me fit in at school.

I need to emphasize how much internet shopping has revolutionized life for the stylish neurotic individual. Not only did I have to choose a style, but I also had to physically go to the store and make eye contact with a stranger while I told them what pants I wanted. This wasn't completely debilitating, but it was overwhelming. All things being equal, I probably would have shopped at Hot Topic, but I didn't have the confidence to do that. The Goth look was becoming more notorious, and I enjoyed being among the counter-cultural types. I never had the nerve to commit to the Goth lifestyle, but I did want to dress in black.

My tipping point began the summer of 1998. I mentioned wanting to get a black shirt from Abercrombie and Fitch, and a friend informed me that they do not sell black clothing. I found that remarkable, but upon further scrutiny I realized it was completely true. I felt the need to shun this growing neo-hippie jam band vibe that always seemed to dress in Abercrombie attire. Dave Mathews Band had released Crash in 1996, and now his music was becoming a way of life for the late 90s redneck group. Elsewhere they may be identified as fratboys, and today we may call them 'bros', but back then they were jam band rednecks. I felt the intense desire to disassociate with this vibe, so I stopped shopping at A&F, and stopped wearing their clothes.

This was also the time that my sister had a drivers license and knew where all the thrift stores were. Buying secondhand clothes was fantastic, mostly for the ironic t-shirt opportunities. I also began wearing clothes with just the right hint of obsurdity. I had some slacks that were just black with a stripe down the leg, but they were clearly made for a marching band uniform. I also had many pairs of cargo shorts still, which remained valid long after summer in Alabama. I still wore blue jeans most of the week. Abercrombie jeans had never fit me properly, so I moved over to the GAP. Their brand of generic straight leg jeans were actually perfect for me.

I did learn that the GAP jeans do not last terribly long. I watched my go-to pair fall apart tragically a couple times a year. In the school year of 1998-99, I started to fall into the new raver style of the day. The JNCO style jeans with enormous legs were actually cutting edge and weird in their day. I had friends with some jeans that barely actually functioned as pants. I kept my choices within the realm of sanity, but still fully embraced the style, which had a lot of crossover with the skater crowd. Pop-punk music was becoming more and more valid. This was the year Blink-182 essentially broke onto the national stage. I find it slightly ridiculous the amount of respect they get nowadays, but whatever - the music was never really my thing. My look in 1998 was raver/skater, but I was mostly listening to classic rock and pearl jam. I enjoyed Nirvana, but it was always Pearl Jam that I defaulted to for music.

It was that year that my sister sewed inserts into a pair of levi's I had to make them into bellbottoms. It was ridiculous and silly, but at this time I was confident enough to welcome the attention. My highschool headmaster literally hated me for them I think. I ought to restate how the trend at the time was leaning towards absurdity, and I did attend a very artistic intelligent private school with no dress code. I had my bellbottoms, but my friends had their oversized jeans, thrift store tuxedos, or a luxurious purple housecoat with frills at the cuffs. That year the dress code was amended to include the prohibition of anything deemed "outlandish". Outlandish is a great word, and it fully empowered the faculty with the power to veto anything. I do not blame them.

That year was great for me. I got my own driver's license and access to a car. At least my anxiety over requesting a ride to a clothing store from my parents was now alleviated. Most weekends my friends and I would go to the thrift stores in search of new clothes and ridiculous artifacts.

That all changed dramatically my senior year of high school. I am still slightly baffled by the shift in trends, but I suppose it makes sense, albeit stupid. Basically I feel that the Grunge movement was more than just music - it reflected an overall frustration with the manufactured nature of culture. Unfortunately the rejection of 'the man' did not last forever. Between 95 and 98, "hippie" culture flourished. There was an overarching opinion that "the 60s" were great and important and worthy of celebration. I do not dispute that notion, but I feel like the story of "the 60s" was widely misinterpreted. When people refer to "the 60s" they often are referring to 67-69 only, which is a minor gripe of mine. The Grunge movement espoused certain ideals of hippie-ness, namely the shunning of mass produced products and living a simple, free life without a concern for traditional notions of appropriate fashion and grooming. This combined with the aging baby-boom generation to create a variety of cultural trends tied to the ideals of "the 60s". Tye-dye shirts, long hair, and there was a goddamn 2nd woodstock.

Lets return to blue jeans. The neo-hippie movement of the mid 90s had its influence on blue jean fashion in a few ways. The baggy style jean of the early 90s had diverged into the enormous raver/hiphop attire, and the more classic designer "slim" fit. Most people were still wearing a roomier jean which still mirrored the old cowboy style. At some point around 1996, one of the many jean designers decided to embrace the 60s vibe with a pair of bellbottom flared jeans. The trend took hold, and by 1997-98, every single pair of womens jeans had a wide flared leg. It was less pronounced on some pairs, but for a period of time, you could not find straight leg women's jeans, let alone tapered. At this point, the men's jeans did something slightly odd, which was to ignore the flared leg trend almost entirely. Women's jeans with the least amount of flare were called "boot cut". There was a "boot cut" jean for men, but what this meant (to abercrombie at least) was to actually cut a vertical line along the seam about two inches at the leg opening.This allowed the jean to open wider around a pair of boots theoretically. This literal cut was everywhere between 97-98 it seemed.

In the 60s, blue jeans didn't really come in a bellbottom style at all. The whole idea of flare legged jeans was an anachronism from the start. Regardless, they became my own white whale. Eventually even men's jeans began taking on a flare at the base, though they were still often referred to as 'boot cut'.  I remember returning to the GAP when I needed generic, non raver, jeans, and being satisfied with their boot cut style. I preferred a wider flare because I wanted to look like Robert Plant essentially.  Any rock icon of the early 70s really.  The GAP jeans weren't flared enough, and they tended to fall apart. I recall they came apart on the front of the thigh from my keys in my pocket, and also at the top corners of the back pockets. I really did check every store, even looking in thrift stores for gems from the 70s. Male bellbottoms were basically a no-go.

This is all leading up to the style shift of my senior year of highschool. I am sure every 18 year old believes their experience is uncommonly transitory and revolutionary, and I am no exception. I have perspective now to understand that everything is in constant flux, yadda yadda yadda. Be that as it may, the fashion world did take a dramatic turn and I watched it happen.

As I said before, the years of 1994-1998 saw the typical highschooler (and 20 something) dressed in a loose fitting t-shirt and jean combination. It reflected the laid-back hippie style mixed with modern grunge and marketed by generic clothing stores such as the GAP and A&F. For some reason, the style shifted from a laid back casual attitude to a much more dressy clean cut look. Many many guys who had worn their hair even just slightly long were now getting close cut styles and using hair gels. The polo shirt and the tucked-in dress shirt made a huge return, and guys were wearing slim khakis instead of jeans. Golf became popular among highschoolers. Guys dressed like the evil rich kids from an 80s comedy. Sweater vests, for gods sake!

I recall a few specific touchstones. The Backstreet Boys, for one, shocked me. Having fully digested every single episode of VH1's "Behind the Music", I had this sense that "boy bands" were a done deal. In other words, society created The New Kids on the Block, and we are all embarrassed for endorsing them. It is completely idiotic to think that another boy band can work with the same formula. We all know how that worked out.

This was also the year that saw Puff Daddy rise to fame. I never paid too much attention to the Hip Hop world but, I was always aware of it. The gansta rap of the mid 90s had apparently waned to the extent that an artist like Puff Daddy was now allowed to be famous. I am certain that there is more to the story than this oversimplification, but it seemed to me that Gangsta Rap was a reflection on the reality of life, whereas this new generation of artists were creating a new idealized aesthetic. Idealized life is expressed through bright lights and shiny reflective surfaces. The word Bling was invented. 

Symbols of wealth are certainly nothing new, but the re-emergence of money as the new cool felt unfortunate. 

categories: Sociology
Sunday 04.17.16
Posted by Robert Bruce Anderson
 

Spotify and some history

I have been playing with Spotify. This is the music streaming application, which originated in Europe and is the spiritual successor to Pandora, in my mind.​

​The dream of perfect recorded music enjoyment has been developing quickly over my lifetime. Mp3 will likely be remembered as a turning point in mankind's notion of possession. I was born in the early 80s, and the idea of "Information is the new commodity" has been in the parlance of society the whole time.  I think very few people outside of the technology field really internalized this idea until Napster and Metallica had their little spat. I can only hope that this is where the story begins, and not with iPod 1.0, because that would be a real shame.  The start of popular culture's desire for a new medium began in 1999, when some has-been rockers thought they saw money left on the table, when in fact they were missing point altogether.

I was personally one of the 300,000 or so Napster users who were kicked off due to our possession of metallica .mp3s. I remember that day clearly, because many of my highschool friends had a similar daily regiment as I did. Before school, we would queue up about five .mp3s downloading. At lunch we would drive home and check the progress, and add more if by some miracle those five were completed. Immediately after school, we would repeat this process, and in the evenings we would make mix cds for ourselves and friends.​  The morning I was kicked off, I had assumed the whole system was gone. When none of my friends had any problems that morning, I went back to read the fine print, and discovered the truth. I had downloaded two Metallica songs, for the sole purpose of learning the guitar for our band's cover versions, and now I was cut off, along with about three hundred-thousand other saps.

This came as no real surprise to me, given my terrible luck for situations like this. What truly hurt was how Napster continued to function for all my buddies, including those who downloaded Metallica after the initial cutoff. I am fairly sure it took over a year for the whole system to be shutdown.  ​

Various other file-sharing systems came and went, and brought with them their insane pop-up ads​ and malware. It took roughly two years of full-blown chaos until bit-torrent was invented, and order began to triumph over chaos.  Amateur programmers invented bit-torrent. The efficiency of the programming is astounding.  It highlights the real mental leap one has to make when thinking digitally.  A bit-torrent file is essentially a paint-by-numbers template, which is miraculously small in size. Once a user has a .torrent file, they can simply find the color paint they need by effectively shopping locally. Instead of having to be connected to a user with the completed picture, all one needs is a glimpse at a million incomplete pictures. Now, the completed picture (or song, or movie, or entire catalog) is never actually moving through any centralized hub, such as Napster.  It is very difficult to really fault anyone, and the data transfer is so efficient, that even a throttled connection can pirate music with a hundred times the effectiveness I had ten years ago.

So now, we live in the wonderful world of the dead and dying recording industry.  They were always parasitic vendors of plastic, who never really served any purpose. It would be interesting to go back in time, and convince led zeppelin to just buy a record pressing machine, and destroy the system in 1976. I suppose they would also have to give out actual reel-to-reel versions to encourage sharing. It would never work. The real first opportunity would be around 1997. Maybe David Bowie and Trent Reznor team up to release Earthling and The Fragile online only. It would likely take you a day to download from a single source like that. Maybe just time out trying to reach it. Maybe they could actually prepare fans for it, and everyone would be content. 

Regardless, it has been a transitional two-decades for the music industry. I believe we are finally reaching the sweet spot, in a sense. Napster may have alerted the world to this technological shift, but Apple sure as hell monetized it correctly. The savvy among us see our options, but iTunes has enabled everyone over 50 to engage with the potential of .mp3.  In a bigger sense, iTunes made a huge section of baby-boomers actually attempt to use a computer.​

And now we have Spotify. This is a terrific system of music digestion. Personally, I rarely use the radio option. This is the mode where you select a song, and Spotify attempts to make an endless playlist based on that song. Other possible names I might give it include "Ruin this song for me". This is why I always hated Pandora.  I can't really vocalize it, but I can't choose a 'sound' without just wanting to hear that artist. I like spotify, because it simply behaves like iTunes, but your catalog is infinite. 

​

categories: Sociology
Monday 09.24.12
Posted by Robert Bruce Anderson
 

mater tabula

Once again i have repaired my​ system with no outside help. Turns out my initial diagnosis was correct, the motherboard was cooked. In theory, the problem could be repaired, but the level of expertise is beyond me, and the ultimate pricetag on employing an expert would surely be higher than that of a new board. 

Ergo, emit mater tabula nova. I was pleased to see it fire up on the first try. The CPU, RAM, and my SSDs are all totally fine. ​ My system lives again.

The other major casualty of the storm was my negative scanner. This device is a sorta relic of the mid​-00s, when digitizing media was a big selling point. Turns out, scanning old pictures is fairly tedious, and most people don't recognize the difference in quality.  These devices have become irrelevant. If you need to scan a few negatives or slides, struggling photo shops can help you. If you want to scan a couple thousand, you might want to invest in some industrial equipment. The middle ground is somewhat forgotten about.   

This means the software is not supported under ​windows 7, so third party versions become necessary.  All the hurdles were worth it, as the third party software and drivers are often more robust than the dated ones from Nikon.  Everything was actually working, but then, lightning.

So to make a long story short, I bought a new scanner as well. It has a transparency mode that allows me to scan any size negative or slide, and is theoretically better than the dedicated film scanner. Now i just have to dial in the settings. The biggest downside is its speed. I want it to make archive quality digital versions, so i am not terribly surprised, but ​my current rate is about 12 frames every 15 minutes. 

Rather than starting chronologically, i have begun with my trip to Brazil. It was formative and exhausting and definitive.  Looking at these frames again ten years later certainly reminds me of a few things.​

categories: Sociology
Wednesday 09.05.12
Posted by Robert Bruce Anderson
 

Crisitunity

All i see around me are money holes that beg to be filled: my two dead pcs, my aging laptop, my tablet that refuses to agree with my demands. My parents TV seems to have lost its HDMI port. The casualties of lightning keep increasing. I try to be thankful for the toys i didn't lose, but I worked hard to build my rigs, and now they are mostly dead.​

Necessity breeds creativity. I took my parent's tripod which came with their Hi8 camcorder from 1993. Camera tech has gone through about four generations since then, yet tripods remain largely unchanged.​ Gotta love solid design.

All of my computer issues have given me a newfound respect for potential interconnectivity. My phone, my camera, my tablet, my computer - all should be simple to connect to each other. Proprietary programming and simple stubbornness prevents this from happening.​

categories: Sociology
Tuesday 08.21.12
Posted by Robert Bruce Anderson
 
Newer / Older